perlmonger (
perlmonger) wrote2005-01-05 11:38 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
LJ
I don't (yet) know if the rumour that Brad is going to sell LJ to Six Apart has any truth behind it, but all I can say to danah boyd's posting on the issue is Word.
If it does happen, I suspect that LJ will end up a shell; an expanding enhanced-sharedholder-value shell perhaps (at least for a while), but ultimately a dead thing.
We'll see.
If it does happen, I suspect that LJ will end up a shell; an expanding enhanced-sharedholder-value shell perhaps (at least for a while), but ultimately a dead thing.
We'll see.
no subject
no subject
Writing for an audience on a platform accessible to all is something I've been doing all my adult life. It's called journalism and I don't do it for free. My journal is my own space where I can write about anything that pleases me or, more commonly, does not, and I do it for myself and the people I respect, like and trust.
*sigh*
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I wonder what the business case is.. the fundamental problem is that free LJ accounts are too good, but restricting them would cripple the community. LJ as a group isnt a set of people that can be marketed to, either. The technology behind LJ isnt particularly sophisticated, so I dont see any sufficiently valuable IP.
The best option is probably for them to see LJ as a long term project - to add new tags to link movable type and LJ communities and generally leave well alone..
(no subject)