![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't (yet) know if the rumour that Brad is going to sell LJ to Six Apart has any truth behind it, but all I can say to danah boyd's posting on the issue is Word.
If it does happen, I suspect that LJ will end up a shell; an expanding enhanced-sharedholder-value shell perhaps (at least for a while), but ultimately a dead thing.
We'll see.
If it does happen, I suspect that LJ will end up a shell; an expanding enhanced-sharedholder-value shell perhaps (at least for a while), but ultimately a dead thing.
We'll see.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 11:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 11:58 am (UTC)Writing for an audience on a platform accessible to all is something I've been doing all my adult life. It's called journalism and I don't do it for free. My journal is my own space where I can write about anything that pleases me or, more commonly, does not, and I do it for myself and the people I respect, like and trust.
*sigh*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 12:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 01:37 pm (UTC)(Though I am clearly not of the fourth estate)
I've attempted webloggage once or twice as an experiment and it just feels entirely wrong. I've also met (and indeed have been priveliged to see the inner life of those I knew from Whitby/Slime/Usenet) far too many fine people to just walk away from this thing.
I feel more discomfited by this news than I would have expected.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 12:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 12:18 pm (UTC)I wonder what the business case is.. the fundamental problem is that free LJ accounts are too good, but restricting them would cripple the community. LJ as a group isnt a set of people that can be marketed to, either. The technology behind LJ isnt particularly sophisticated, so I dont see any sufficiently valuable IP.
The best option is probably for them to see LJ as a long term project - to add new tags to link movable type and LJ communities and generally leave well alone..
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 01:46 pm (UTC)As has been mentioned elsewhere, the userbase are the set of people who wouldn't want anything to do with the friendless latte-hoovering scum who keep 'blogs'.
LJ's USP is the access control. That alone makes it a completely different thing from MT and analogues. I suppose some random cross-realm hackery could make LJ and TypePad identities trust one another... Hmm...