perlmonger: (plugh)
2007-07-29 11:02 am
Entry tags:

chain lubrication

I’m suffering a lot less than I expected.

Yesterday afternoon, taking advantage of the extraordinarily poor planning that allowed a clear, sunny day to coincide with Bristol Harbour Festival, I went out on my bike further than the farm shop just outside the village for the first time in [mumble] months. If Google is to be believed, an 18-mile round trip to the far end of the nasty riverside housing estate in St Annes and back. Nearly all on the flat, it has to be said (apart from a brief diversion by the floating harbour through the heaving crowds of the festival, I followed the river), but, on the way back, I got my old and creaking bones up the hill from Kennel Lodge Road to the Ashton Court car park without stopping, which quite surprised me.

What else? Before, our new Zywall dual-WAN router and firewall arrived a day late (distie fuckup) to replace the old Sonicwall (dead) and Cyclone (dying). I installed it and [livejournal.com profile] ramtops configured it, and it’s working a treat; noticeably quicker than the previous setup even when it was working properly.

After, I read another wodge of HP7 then cooked: improvised Indian-style something to use the last tub of frozen pre-cooked mince+beans+carrots+onions, an experiment in pre-preparation that we won’t repeat as it’s as much work to get the stuff to taste of anything as cooking everything from scratch. In the unlikely event of anyone being interested, I’ve written up what I did on [livejournal.com profile] nibblous.

Waiting for the Jekyll finale, we rewatched the pilot of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip now it’s turned up on terrestrial. We weren’t impressed first time round, but thoroughly enjoyed it last night: pure Sorkin, of course, with lots of familiar faces in cast and names in crew; derivative and predictable, but fun.

I won’t say much about Jekyll, out of consideration, like, but Moff has pulled a blinder with this. As full of holes as a thing full of holes, of course, but still some of the best, most stylish and wittiest television I’ve seen for years. [livejournal.com profile] ramtops and I both kicked ourselves for not seeing the final twist coming. My hope is that the BBC resists the temptation to make the obvious followup series: some things (many things) are best left, but TV companies are as good at ignoring that as they are at killing series that should continue mid-season.
perlmonger: (gorey)
2007-07-21 09:51 am
Entry tags:

noodle-related incident

Prompted by [livejournal.com profile] drpete, you’ll find my LJ interests collage under the cut if you can be arsed to wait for all the images to download. More interesting to me is the interests that Yahoo! image! search! couldn’t find a match for:

  • anarcho-cynicism
  • asafœtida (Yahoo! don’t! like! ligatures!?)
  • blunkett baiting
  • blunkett basting
  • curmudgeonly grousing
  • not stabbing sausages
  • polyfelinity
  • secret suit of voles
  • the checkbox tyranny resistance
  • zar-bettu-zekigal
  • ♪ (or possibly ∞; the last image looks like a charset table so it could be either)

In other news, our hard-won Trowbridge tickets are likely going to waste; neither of us really feel like braving the squelch today when we could stay at home working (eh?). We may go to Costco too, for that real frisson of living-on-the-edge excitement.

Oh, and in common with 117% of the households in Britain, a copy of HP7 arrived this morning; [livejournal.com profile] ramtops, having strategically just finished Ingathering, is settled in the bath with it as I type. I’ll have to wait, as interleaved reading of a single copy isn’t really practical.

my interests collage )
perlmonger: (skydancer)
2007-07-16 04:51 pm
Entry tags:

weekending


Clara
Originally uploaded by perlmonger.
A quiet weekend, but we managed to drag our exhausted carcasses to Sally’s in Chippenham for her birthday party. The sun shone and a good time was had, with great heaving mounds of food from the barbie, but sadly we left early owing to the aforementioned exhaustedness. [more photos]

Sunday was mostly spent in getting the rejuvenated nibb’lous ready for going live this morning, and in Mac cooking and us eating a truly sumptuous dinner of pan-fried duckbreast with roast spuds, fennel and carrots. Yum.
perlmonger: (plugh)
2007-07-13 02:13 pm
Entry tags:

[baaa] MOOOOSE!!!!

I don’t do memes very often these days, and post the results more rarely yet, but this one (via [livejournal.com profile] pecunium) I couldn’t not post. The questions are rather more interesting than is usual for these things too.

Your Score: The Noble Elk

Here’s your results! Your spirit animal has a Nobility ranking of 15 out of 18.

Your spirit animal is the noble elk. They are the most adaptable of all, and only guard those with great wisdom and understanding. The elk is a highly noble creature, and has a strong spiritual force that will guide and protect you well. You are truly blessed to have such an amazing and mystical spirit animal. It is extremely rare to have an elk as a spirit animal.

***Wondering how this animal was chosen for you? These questions were carefully thought out to see how important you hold certain virtues such as: humanism, self-knowledge, rationalism, the love of freedom and other somewhat Hellenic ideals. Some of the questions were very subtle. Your score was then matched with an animal of corresponding nobility. However, you shouldn’t think this was a right/wrong sort of test, but more of an idealistic values test. It’s ok to not hold these values, you’ll just get an animal spirit of lower stature if you do!***

Link: The What is Your Spirit Animal Test written by FindingEros on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test
perlmonger: (1984)
2007-07-09 07:21 pm
Entry tags:

on listening to the Home Service whilst driving home yesterday

We heard about this on the news; is it just me who thinks that it’s the thin edge of a very thick wedge indeed? We’ve already had this in the campaign to get people to shop benefit “cheats” and it all helps nicely in propagating an atmosphere of distrust and fear. Does it benefit anyone at all but the government? And who will be the first person snitched out of malice, for being in possession of a dusky complexion, or just for a laugh? E M Forster applies, I think.

The news was followed by possibly the most egregious piece of blatant fearmongering I’ve yet heard from the post-Hutton BBC: File on Four on Iran and export controls. In the entire programme there wasn’t a single attempt to justify their prejudgements: Iran is uniquely evil; US export controls are necessary and correct if possibly a mite liberal; UK and EU controls are entirely inadequate, and as for the Polish courts releasing someone the US wanted (and want) extradited who had broken no EU or Polish law, words nearly failed them.

There was a magnificent example of tabloid “investigative” journalism when we had an extended description of Hampstead property prices leading to a description of a trader who, it was carefully pointed out, had done nothing illegal. His sin was to be of Iranian extraction, to be rich and to have sold on dual use tech to Tehran; his guilt confirmed by his refusal to speak to the odious shit wielding a hatchet at his front door.

Lest I be misunderstood, I hold little truck with the current Iranian regime. They are, however, no worse than many (most?) other governments and their current singling out as the focus of the axis of Teh Eval is mostly a matter of Realpolitik. It was pointed out that they are using whatever means are necessary to buy parts to keep their F-14s flying: it was not pointed out how on Earth else they could keep their air force operational when they’re under blockade.

Still, as long as we’re all kept in a state of fear, eh?
perlmonger: (pete)
2007-07-09 02:55 pm
Entry tags:

Note to self

harry!

In future, don’t drive from Bristol to Norwich, and back again on the same weekend as the British Grand Prix at Silverstone. It didn’t help the journey that the Thaab overheated as we arrived in Norwich, having decided to develop a rad leak. A sachet of RadWeld courtesy of the AA seems to have fixed that, though.

That aside, [livejournal.com profile] ramtops and I had entirely too short a time with Harry and Clare, arriving Friday afternoon and driving back at lunch time today. There’s not much to report, aside from Harry being Enormous, and Utterly Wonderful, and Clare foiling our plan to secrete him away in our bag.

We ([livejournal.com profile] kalunina, Grandad, [livejournal.com profile] ramtops and myself) ate lasagne together on Saturday night, and Harry slept with Mac and me on Saturday night, in theory to give an unbroken night’s sleep for his mum. We suspect that she actually spent much of night awake listening in case of a Massive Grand Parental Supervisory Failure that didn’t happen: Harry slept until 1:30, scoffed the first part of the minski provided, slept another couple of hours, scoffed more, had his nappy changed (the first I’ve done for over ten years), gruntled a bit, and slept till morning. It went very well indeed.

So. We’re home, and missing the boy already: there ought to be some way to move Bristol and Norwich closer together.

[cross-posted from [livejournal.com profile] bubbamoose]
perlmonger: (badger)
2007-06-28 06:43 pm
Entry tags:

light bulb in my mouth

Watching Andrew Marr’s programme about Hume and Edinburgh last night, and Hume’s acceptance of his mortality, left me thinking about death.

I’m with Hume on this; my only concerns about dying are of what difficulties and upset will be left for those who survive me and, inevitably, for things I’ll leave undone. I don’t want to stop being, because (these days; it was not always so) I mostly like be-ing, but ceasing to be has no fears in and of itself.

What I have noticed though, in the last year or so, is occasionally thinking that I won’t buy a book or a DVD because it feels a waste; because I’ll likely die before I get round to reading/watching the thing more than once. Something in my psyche is regarding the likely twenty-odd, possible thirty or forty years I have left as being a perceptibly approaching end. This, at least, I’m not sure I like: intellectually, I’d rather just carry on living in something close to the now and, well, just stop one day.

There. I’ll probably get eaten by the cats tomorrow :)
perlmonger: (books)
2007-06-12 03:55 pm
Entry tags:

Naming Textuality: Oral Poetics in Bryan Costales's sendmail

# strip group: syntax (not inside angle brackets!) and trailing semicolon
R$*			$: $1 <@>			mark addresses
R$* < $* > $* <@>	$: $1 < $2 > $3			unmark 
R@ $* <@>		$: @ $1				unmark @host:...
R$* [ IPv6 : $+ ] <@>	$: $1 [ IPv6 : $2 ]		unmark IPv6 addr
R$* :: $* <@>		$: $1 :: $2			unmark node::addr
R:include: $* <@>	$: :include: $1			unmark :include:...
R$* : $* [ $* ]		$: $1 : $2 [ $3 ] <@>		remark if leading colon
R$* : $* <@>		$: $2				strip colon if marked
R$* <@>			$: $1				unmark
R$* ;			   $1				strip trailing semi
R$* < $+ :; > $*	$@ $2 :; <@>			catch <list:;>
R$* < $* ; >		   $1 < $2 >			bogus bracketed semi


[ blame [livejournal.com profile] brisingamen for pointing me at this madness; I’d quite like to read “Voicing, Empowering, Transforming: Affliction in Washburn & Evans and the Colonialist Corporeality of Xenophobia in TCP/IP” too, if anyone felt like writing it ]
perlmonger: (censorship)
2007-05-31 09:33 pm

on the current drama

I wasn’t going to post anything about the current LJ madness triggered by a bunch of homophobic, racist, willfully ignorant scumbags (warning: following that link will risk your computer picking up malware), but I couldn’t not link to Hanne Blank’s open letter to LJ/SixApart as an antidote. The woman she speak sense; would that more people on this planet did so.
perlmonger: (badger badger)
2007-05-29 01:30 pm
Entry tags:

Happy Anniversary

to [livejournal.com profile] ramtops; we were married eight years ago today, and the heavens opened...

(some reading this might remember that rainstorm, and possibly even the afternoon and evening in the Angel, though I confess that my recollection of the latter is a mite hazy)
perlmonger: (1984)
2007-05-27 10:10 am

Quote of the day, I think

From the comments to this:
I for one would happily support the imposition of stringent new restrictions on civil liberties, as long as they specified that any idiot who says “If you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear” was automatically locked up for the rest of their lives, on the grounds that their crushing stupidity represented a danger to public safety.

Rev. Stuart Campbell, Bath


[ heads up to [livejournal.com profile] blue_condition for pointing me at this latest descent into totalitarianism ]
perlmonger: (Pirate)
2007-05-25 11:15 pm
Entry tags:

crabs

Even as [livejournal.com profile] easterbunny said. Crabs.

not any real spoilers, but still )

Cup of tea and bed now, I think. I’ll not sleep though, after total sugar overload from all the banged grains I consumed; hopefully the glass of rye I’ve just finished will help.
perlmonger: (plugh)
2007-05-22 05:29 pm

hidden in plain sight

Turns out that if you create an input control on the fly in IE6 and stuff it into the DOM tree, it gets inserted into its form’s elements array, but not into the associated hashtable. It’s there and not there all at the same time...
      if (!iewin || theForm.elements[theField])
	theField=theForm.elements[theField];
      else // it beggars belief, really
	for (var i=0; i<theForm.elements.length; i++)
	  if (theForm.elements[i].name==theField) {
	    theField=theForm.elements[i];
	    break;
	  }

MS have been kind enough to retain backward compatibility on this “feature” in IE7.
perlmonger: (pete)
2007-05-21 09:07 pm

hidden agender

Yesterday was the first time I’ve been in the children’s clothing section of a conventional retail store (Norwich M&S FWIW) for mumble years. It was a profoundly depressing experience: have we learned nothing as a society? The rigidity of gender stereotyping actually seems to be worse than I remember.

OK, not everything in society is worse. Overall, acceptance of non-heteronormative sexuality seems more widespread (though ghod knows not widespread enough) but, still, the retrenchment of patriarchy proceeds apace. I can hope that it’s a rearguard action - reactionary in the literal sense - but I fear otherwise. That feminism is dismissed, rejected, mocked when its insights are so obviously needed isn’t a good sign.

Oh, and if you’ve got this far, go read Piers Cawley on the continuing and far too rarely challenged sexism in geekdom.
perlmonger: (Default)
2007-05-21 04:57 pm

Well, we're back


Harry, with doting grandfather
Originally uploaded by perlmonger.
from a long weekend in Norwich inspecting [livejournal.com profile] kalunina's newborn moosebaby Harry John, seen here being doted on by his grandfather (as opposed to me; as a semi-detached grandparent, we've decided that I'm GrandPete).

He's a thoroughly charming child, and I spent entirely too little time communing with him. This will be addressed soon, but being separated by a five hour drive does cramp things somewhat: I want some topological adjustment that renders Bristol and Norwich closer on demand.
perlmonger: (eye hospital)
2007-05-16 08:51 am

taking up GrandPetely duties

[livejournal.com profile] kalunina‘s as yet unnamed baby moose, Harry John, emerged into our world at just after 2am today in Norwich, weighing 7lb 1011oz, according to his grandfather who was there and cut the cord. Mother and son are well, and [livejournal.com profile] ramtops and I will be venturing spinward for the weekend to say “hello” and do what we can to help with this start of a new beginning.

Seems appropriate to slightly paraphrase Kurt Vonnegut at this point:
“Hello, $bubbamoose. Welcome to Earth. It’s hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It’s round and wet and crowded. At the outside, baby, you’ve got about a hundred years here. There’s only one rule that I know of, baby—God damn it, you’ve got to be kind.”
perlmonger: (libdem)
2007-05-05 04:34 pm

on observing the swinging stable door

There are, I think, some specific reasons we did so badly in North Somerset on Thursday that we probably won’t discuss amongst ourselves, but our generally dismal showing UK-wide is another matter (the places where we did succeed will, again, likely be for local reasons - as is right and proper for local elections).

What concerns me here is why we failed (and matching votes with the Labour Party is failure), when the Tories in England, the SNP and (to a slightly lesser extent) PC did not. My suspicion, my fear, is that we lost because we lacked and lack the courage of our convictions. We elected a “safe pair of hands” as leader when that was the last thing we needed and our campaigning was driven by fear of losing and by other peoples’ agendas (lawnorder FFS!), not by principle and what we know is right and important even when that cuts right across the Establishment consensus.

Craig Murray mentions Iraq and Trident replacement and I would agree that they’re the current issues most likely to resonate with your voter-on-the-street, but I would like to see more on countering the culture of fear that the Home Office is using to push through its encroachments on liberty and the rule of law, and less mealy mouthed compromise from careerist politicians eager to be the next step in the Blair-Cameron axis of empty rhetoric.

Publicising and arguing against what’s being done to agriculture might win more votes from the Tories in rural constituencies than it loses from North London second home owners who don’t like the smell of manure, and where’s the national campaign on PFI and its legacy? As it stands, it’s easier to find reports on LibDems supporting PFI deals than mentioning the country being in hock for decades on the never-never for no better reason than creative accounting by the Treasury to pretend they’re not borrowing.

We shouldn’t be on the defensive, is all. Maybe if we weren’t, we might persuade a few more people we’re worth voting for.
perlmonger: (ice warrior)
2007-05-04 02:00 pm

Let's compare like with like then

On Today on the Home Service this morning: “Tory gains in England [ blah blah ...] while the LibDems have lost 155 seats and Labour six councils” - not verbatim, of course, and those are the figures current as I type, but you’ll find the original somewhere in the last hour of the programme on listen again until you don’t.

Might they have considered saying that “the LibDems have gained one council and Labour lost 225 seats”? What do you think? >;)
perlmonger: (1984)
2007-05-03 08:33 am
Entry tags:

Vote early, vote often

If you’ve got an election today, git out there and vote, damnit.

As RAH said, even if there’s nobody you want to vote for, there’s sure to be someone to vote against. Just as long as whoever you vote for isn’t in the BNP or similar, or Noo Fucking Labour either - I would never have believed I’d write it, but I’d rather you voted Tory than for those bastards.

VOTE!