![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
No metering, so that's an iterative process of test shot and check histogram, starting from a guess that should hopefully converge with the desired end-state over time. My only focus aid (other than sadly failing eyesight) is a tiny green dot that appears at the bottom left of the viewfinder when the camera reckons the focus area is about right. It works, but holding the shutter half-cocked (to stop the display timing out) while focusing is fiddly. It's times like this that I really miss my old ME Super.
But it works, a damned sight better than the crappy kit lens (second iteration¹) that came with the body. And I need to think about what I'm doing with the camera, which is a very good thing: freedom and creativity are defined in large part by their constraints. I'll never be a great photographer, or even a particularly good one, but I know that I'm liable to take better pictures, all else being equal, without a zoom and automated everything doing my thinking for me.
Now all I need is to allow myself the time to go and actually take photos. The few I've taken by way of testing, I've uploaded to flickr
¹ second, because a few weeks ago I dropped my camera onto a concrete surface: it landed lens-first, onto the lens hood, which likely prevented damage to the body, but did the lens no good whatsoever - "sproing" is the operative word here, I think. I've inherited
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-23 12:50 pm (UTC)I have one too - it's awesome. Like you, I find it hard to handle the manual focussing - the little dot in the viewfinder is almost impossible to see in certain light - but the lens is truly wonderful and there's something 'honest' about taking a good photograph by manually focussing the lens. You start to think about position and composition more because often you have to physically rethink your shot, and move around the subject a little more. I found myself climbing over things, kneeling down or stretching around much more than I ever have done using the kit lens - with which it's all to easy to lazily point the damn thing and shoot.
This was the first 'separate' lens we have bought for the camera and it's been a bit of a revelation. Now I understand why people were telling me to spend the money on lenses more than the basic camera itself. I took it with me to London at the weekend, we left the kit lens behind (we have a lowly D40x, about 6 months old). At first it drove Nic mad but as time wore on I think she began to appreciate the depth-of-field effect - she took some nice photos at the zoo of ants, spiders and the like, with great blurry backgrounds and sharply focussed subjects.
We'll have to get them flickered and then I'll give you a link. I'm behind a client's rather feeble broadband at the moment but will have a look at your pictures when I get in tonight. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-23 01:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-23 03:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-23 04:34 pm (UTC)¹ a long story from the distant past for another time; lenses were the least of what I lost.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-24 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-24 07:04 am (UTC)You'll love that lens. Despite having four others, I seem addicted to the 50mm 1.8.