perlmonger: (planet)
[personal profile] perlmonger
Tenser, said the Tensor analyses Doc Smith’s usage of language in the Lensmen series. Lovely stuff, though I would disagree that the first two in the series are “lesser prequels”.

It’s probably getting on time to add the whole lot to my to-read heap again.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-04 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ccomley.livejournal.com
Yikes. What is it about this ghastly ghastly prose that people seek to read it - and then read it again?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-04 02:41 pm (UTC)
ext_17706: (Default)
From: [identity profile] perlmonger.livejournal.com
I'm really not quite sure, but something there is. There's a sort of special charm to its particular variety of awfulness that sucks at me every 12 to 18 months or so; a bit like a pressor beam sucks at a negasphere, really.

What's truly impressive is that he managed to insert a parody of space opera right into the heart of one them. I mean, quite apart from the rest of the book.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-04 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-stevewpal562.livejournal.com
I'll stick with the Foundation series. Thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-04 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elimloth.livejournal.com
I vry much liked the Lensman series (and the Skylark series too). I am afraid, though, that a revisit of these wonderful novels might sully my fond memories of the expanse of places brought on by Bergenholm drive; will the prose endure the test of time? Or, shall I watch Farscape?

Profile

perlmonger: (Default)
perlmonger

July 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios